Should anyone ever be “anti”?
Should I ever be anti something? I don’t think I should be, rather than knowing what I am against, I should know what I am for.
Let me expand, am I against required public schooling? Yes, err no, um wha?? I am for choice in schooling, thus vouchers. Because required public schooling, cannot exist with what I am for. Does this make me explicitly against? Should I directly oppose? Should the status quo be my target for destruction? Or should my goal be what I aim for?
If I am for something, wouldn’t my pursuit of it imply the destruction of that cannot coexist? This logically is true, but is one approach more moral?
I am not a philosopher, but yet I require a personal philosophy, thus my logic tells me, that destruction, hate, targets (for destruction) is not by its self constructive. My goals for new creation, should they destroy from their presence (think creative destruction) can produce value to me and mine.
Know what you are for, never be against for the sake of being against. Push for what logic tells you is right. Until proven otherwise I wish to live this way, for creation, not destruction, that leaves only ashes, I make ashes to grow better things, with the plan and focus of better things, not ashes.
